I had a friend contact me today and say that someone had told her I was pro-Common Core. I want to respond to that and let you know where I stand.
So, here is what it really comes down to. No, I do not support Common Core. I have had kids in schools for 10 years-8 schools during that period in 2 different states. During that time, I have noticed a pattern in education. Every 2-3 years, the new shiny thing comes along which will save education. What we actually end up doing is spending millions of dollars, pulling teachers out of classrooms to train them on how to implement the new shiny program, and in the end, my children and your children lose out. For me, the solution is simple. We put phenomenal teachers in the classroom and then get out of their way.
I want local control for my children. I want a voice in their education and that is a large part of why I am running for school board. I want to hear your voices. How do you want to improve our schools in Alpine School District?
Showing posts with label local control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label local control. Show all posts
Monday, March 24, 2014
Letter To Board Members Regarding the Self-Administered Medications Policy
The following is a letter I sent to ASD board members on March 18, 2014 regarding the updated policy they were presented for self-administering medications:
Dear Board Members-
Dear Board Members-
I appreciate your willingness to examine and update your
policy regarding Epi-pens and other life-saving medications. I do have some concerns that I would like to
share with you before the board makes a final decision on the updated policy
that has been presented. I understand
that you consulted your attorneys as well as the Utah County Health Department
in updating this policy. I do believe
that not including parents was a mistake.
While I appreciate and value the input of these professionals, parents
of children who are living with life-threatening conditions have important and
essential insight as to how to treat these conditions.
My first concern is with 1.1.6 that states that “a district
employee may not administer hypodermic syringe injections or “shots” without
express written permission of the Director of Student Services.” I am concerned that this policy would prevent
teachers and other ASD employees from administering life-saving epinephrine
should my daughter go into anaphylactic shock and be unable to self-administer
her medication.
I also see potential problems with 2.4, 3.4, and 4.4. The new policy eliminates parents from having
a say in how and where their child’s life-saving medication is stored. While I appreciate the valuable work that
administrators and nurses provide, placing this decision solely in their hands
can lead to major problems. A high
school principal may have 2,500 students and school nurses in Utah are one for
every 4, 952 students. To assume that
these individuals will fully comprehend the needs of students with
life-threatening conditions is incorrect.
I believe that the decision about where and how life-saving medication
can be stored should be done “in consultation with parents.”
I know my child best.
I know what it looks like when she goes into anaphylaxis. Every time my daughter has ingested a tree
nut, she has gone into anaphylactic shock.
I have a friend whose daughter has a peanut allergy. Her allergy has been treated successfully
with Benadryl. But an administrator or
school nurse may not understand the ways our two daughters should be treated
differently. The other issue associated
with this is that as a parent, whenever I have signed a field trip permission
form for my daughter, I have always written at the bottom, “Please remember to
bring her Epi-pen.” An administrator or school nurse may not remember this, but
I always do. Storing these medications
in the nurse’s office may seem like a simple solution, but the situation is
more complicated than that.
We have actually encountered problems more than once when we
have turned in Epi-pens to schools.
Twice when I have gone to retrieve the Epi-pen on the last day of
school, the medication has been missing.
One was found at the beginning of the following school year, but the
other was never recovered. While a
missing Epi-pen has been an annoyance since they are so expensive, it could
have been the difference between life and death if my daughter had gone into
anaphylaxis. We have always provided
elementary school teachers with an Epi-pen to be kept in the classroom as
well. I have never had a teacher
misplace my daughter’s life-saving medication.
Humans err. I feel it is better
for a teacher to keep this medication in her classroom than in a nurse’s
office. Time is of the essence in
treating medical emergencies and precious moments can be lost figuring out who
has the key to the medication box in the nurse’s office. A teacher who has one or 2 children in an
elementary class with life-threatening issues will be more likely to keep track
of these medications than a nurse who may not know the child.
The other policy I see as having potential problems is 3.6
where it states that “no student is permitted to sell, share, or otherwise give
to others any medication, prescription or non prescription.” Epinephrine does not give you a “high,” it is
simply adrenaline. But it can mean the difference
between life and death. The way I read
the policy is that if my daughter has a friend having an anaphylactic reaction
and her friend does not have her Epi-pen, my daughter is violating the
district’s drug policy if she chooses to give her Epi-pen to her friend and
save her life. Epi-pens only come in 2
doses-Jr. and Adult. While this may seem
like an unlikely situation, with 1 in 13 children being diagnosed with food
allergies, it is all too possible that during my daughter’s school career, she
may witness another student having an anaphylactic reaction and be in a position
to assist. Epi-pens actually come in a
twinpack because if the anaphylaxis symptoms have not started subsiding within
15 minutes, another Epi-pen must be administered. It is very possible that a child would have
an Epi-pen and need another Epi-pen injection, but not have a second pen. In my experience, children with
life-threatening conditions generally have a higher level of maturity than
their peers. They are all too aware of
their own mortality. I am not suggesting
that students should be given a free-for-all to trade out and share
medications, but I also think there is a basic common sense that in
life-threatening situations, there should be exceptions.
My last concern is about policy 3.2 which states that the
parent “authorizes the student to have and use the epinephrine auto-injector
while acknowledging that the student is responsible for and capable of
self-administering the medication.” I
want to clarify that while my student is fully capable of self-administering
her Epi-pen, anaphylaxis means that her airway shuts down and she can pass out,
rendering her unable to self-administer her Epi-pen. With her being “responsible” for
self-administering, I want to make sure that if she becomes unable to administer
her medication, that it does not relieve the school of the responsibility of
injecting her.
I appreciate your time and your willingness to hear my
concerns so that we can all work together to keep the children of ASD safe.
Julie King
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)